October 15, 2008

Teradata’s Petabyte Power Players

As previously hinted, Teradata has now announced 4 of the 5 members of its “Petabyte Power Players” club.  These are enterprises with 1+ petabyte of data on Teradata equipment.  As is commonly the case when Teradata discusses such figures, there’s some confusion as to how they’re actually counting.  But as best I can tell, Teradata is counting: Read more

October 15, 2008

Vertica offers some more numbers

Eric Lai interviewed Dave Menninger of Vertica.  Highlights included:

September 17, 2008

Netezza overseas

22% of Netezza’s revenue comes from outside the US, at least if we use last quarter’s figures as a guide.  At first blush, that doesn’t sound like much.  Indeed, percentage-wise it surely lags behind Teradata, Greenplum (which has sold a lot in Asia/Pacific under Netezza’s former head of that region), and a few smaller competitors headquartered outside the US.  But a few conversations I had today suggest a rosier view.  Read more

September 17, 2008

Netezza application areas

I’m at the Netezza “Enzee” user conference in Orlando.  So one or more Netezza posts are in order.

One theme of the brief analyst meeting was Netezza’s increasing business focus on vertical markets.  In particular, Netezza is hiring managers for a range of vertical markets.  The commercial ones cited (at various levels of maturity) included: Read more

September 14, 2008

Jaspersoft numbers

I chatted Friday with marketing VP Nick Halsey of Jaspersoft, which is probably the most successful open source business intelligence company. (That’s based just anecdotally, on mentions. I’d put Pentaho #2, with Talend commonly getting mentioned along with the two BI vendors for its ETL.) I’ll go straight to the numbers, per Nick, before talking in a separate post about what Jaspersoft actually sells.

Read more

September 13, 2008

Top DBMS on Linux

I was looking up George Crump’s blogs in connection with his recent post on SSDs, and I stumbled upon one that outlines at great length what features Linux backup systems should have. I won’t claim to have read it word for word, but what did catch my eye were a couple of comments on DBMS market share, which boiled down to:

  1. Oracle
  2. MySQL
  3. PostgreSQL

Read more

September 12, 2008

Some Netezza customer metrics

From the conference call based on Netezza’s July, 2008 Q1, as of the end of Q1:

August 29, 2008

Sales figures for analytic DBMS

One of my clients asked how many new customers I thought were buying analytic DBMS each quarter. I don’t generally track such things, but hey — a client asked, so I did the best I could. And since I did the work, now I’ll share it generally. To wit:
Read more

August 29, 2008

Enterprises are buying multiple brands of analytic DBMS each

Over the past few weeks I’ve had a lot of NDA discussions about analytic DBMS vendors’ specific customers. And so I’ve been acutely aware of something I already sort of knew — just as there was in prior generations of database management technology, there’s huge overlap among analytic DBMS vendors’ customer bases as well. As they always have, enterprises are investing in multiple different brands of DBMS, even in cases where those DBMS can do pretty much the same things.

For example:

← Previous Page

Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:

Login

Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.