April 21, 2008
Netezza pricing
In connection with the announcement of the Teradata 2500, I asked some Teradata competitors about pricing. Netezza’s response amounted to “We don’t disclose list pricing, but our cheapest system handles about 3 1/4 TB and sells for under $200K.” So Netezza’s actual pricing is well below the list price of the Teradata 2500.
Categories: Data warehouse appliances, Data warehousing, Netezza, Pricing, Teradata
Subscribe to our complete feed!
Comments
11 Responses to “Netezza pricing”
Leave a Reply
Search our blogs and white papers
Monash Research blogs
- DBMS 2 covers database management, analytics, and related technologies.
- Text Technologies covers text mining, search, and social software.
- Strategic Messaging analyzes marketing and messaging strategy.
- The Monash Report examines technology and public policy issues.
- Software Memories recounts the history of the software industry.
User consulting
Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.
Vendor advisory
We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.
Monash Research highlights
Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email. |
-
Recent posts
-
Categories
- About this blog
- Analytic glossary
- Analytic technologies
- Application areas
- Buying processes
- Companies and products
- 1010data
- Ab Initio Software
- Actian and Ingres
- Aerospike
- Akiban
- Aleri and Coral8
- Algebraix
- Alpha Five
- Amazon and its cloud
- ANTs Software
- Aster Data
- Ayasdi
- Basho and Riak
- Business Objects
- Calpont
- Cassandra
- Cast Iron Systems
- Cirro
- Citus Data
- ClearStory Data
- Cloudant
- Cloudera
- Clustrix
- Cogito and 7 Degrees
- Cognos
- Continuent
- Couchbase
- CouchDB
- Databricks, Spark and BDAS
- DATAllegro
- Datameer
- DataStax
- Dataupia
- dbShards and CodeFutures
- Elastra
- EMC
- Endeca
- EnterpriseDB and Postgres Plus
- Exasol
- Expressor
- FileMaker
- GenieDB
- Gooddata
- Greenplum
- Groovy Corporation
- Hadapt
- Hadoop
- HBase
- Hortonworks
- HP and Neoview
- IBM and DB2
- illuminate Solutions
- Infobright
- Informatica
- Information Builders
- Inforsense
- Intel
- Intersystems and Cache'
- Jaspersoft
- Kafka and Confluent
- Kalido
- Kaminario
- Kickfire
- Kognitio
- KXEN
- MapR
- MarkLogic
- McObject
- memcached
- MemSQL
- Metamarkets and Druid
- Microsoft and SQL*Server
- MicroStrategy
- MonetDB
- MongoDB
- MySQL
- Neo Technology and Neo4j
- Netezza
- NuoDB
- Nutonian
- Objectivity and Infinite Graph
- Oracle
- Oracle TimesTen
- ParAccel
- Pentaho
- Pervasive Software
- PivotLink
- Platfora
- PostgreSQL
- Progress, Apama, and DataDirect
- QlikTech and QlikView
- Rainstor
- Revolution Analytics
- Rocana
- salesforce.com
- SAND Technology
- SAP AG
- SAS Institute
- ScaleBase
- ScaleDB
- Schooner Information Technology
- SciDB
- SenSage
- SequoiaDB
- SnapLogic
- Software AG
- solidDB
- Splunk
- Starcounter
- StreamBase
- Sybase
- Syncsort
- Tableau Software
- Talend
- Teradata
- Tokutek and TokuDB
- Truviso
- VectorWise
- Vertica Systems
- VoltDB and H-Store
- WibiData
- Workday
- Xkoto
- XtremeData
- Yarcdata and Cray
- Zettaset
- Zoomdata
- Data integration and middleware
- Data types
- DBMS product categories
- Emulation, transparency, portability
- Fun stuff
- Market share and customer counts
- Memory-centric data management
- Michael Stonebraker
- Parallelization
- Presentations
- Pricing
- Public policy
- Software as a Service (SaaS)
- Specific users
- Storage
- Theory and architecture
- TransRelational
- Uncategorized
-
Date archives
-
Links
-
Admin
I think you may have misread the press release…the TD 550 is 6 tb for $67k per tb.
The 2500 is 146 tb at 125k per tb.
146 TB is the max.
That’s 24 nodes.
Most discussion of the Teradata 2500 — including in the press release — starts from the single-node version.
And Randy Lea of Teradata told me last week the 550 tops out at 2-3 TB.
Best,
CAM
Curt,
It is also important to note that the 550 model is an SMP server so it is not a high-performance system like other TD models – it is more like Oracle on Sun/HP/IBM in that regard.
As far as I recall all Netezza models are MPP servers including its low-end offering.
NG
Curt,
Netezza’s list pricing is around $100k per TB, so Teradata is a bit more expensive at $125k.
Both are significantly more expensive than DATAllegro. Our list prices range from around $8k to $50k per TB, depending on the product range.
Stuart Frost
CEO, DATAllegro
NG,
Agreed. The 550 product is not to be taken seriously for most purposes, even if the reporter for one major trade pub got confused by it.
But hey — as long as anybody wants it, Teradata was quite right to productize it.
CAM
Stuart,
As per the above, a competent Netezza exec says his system sells for a lot less than the list price you’re attributing to them.
Is the same true of DATAllegro systems? 🙂
Best,
CAM
[…] pricing, and am posting the results as I get them. Earlier installments featured Teradata and Netezza. Now ParAccel is […]
For clarification, the TD 2500 is 24 racks or 48 nodes — not 24 nodes. Total user space capacity is just shy of 150TB.
As mentioned, the TD 550 is an SMP, one-node system that can never be expanded with BYNET (doesn’t have it). It’s meant more for test/dev or someone just starting out with datawarehousing. Not a long-term solution if you’re looking to expand, but a cheaper price-point.
Stuart,
With all the price and performance FUD I’ve seen in your posts here and elsewhere, we need Bobby Flay to get DATAllegro, Teradata and Netezza in for a good old-fashioned throwdown to see who’s the best.
I’m confident Stuart would rush to appear at any joint DATAllegro/Netezza/Teradata event I tried to set up.
I’m pretty sure, however, that Netezza and Teradata would NOT opt to join us …
🙂
CAM
[…] price/TB figure is in the same ballpark as Teradata’s, while the lower-end figure is in Netezza […]
Base pricing for Netezza TwinFin is available here:
http://estore.gemini-systems.com/index.html?section=ibm-netezza-twinfin