September 19, 2011
Exadata Mini-Me?
It is being suggested that Oracle is about to introduce small, (relatively) cheap Exadata boxes. Key quotes include:
We estimate a price point of $100K-$200K, well below Exadata prices of $500K-$2.5M.
and
- The Exadata could fit under a desk;
- Customers wouldn’t need a database admin to maintain the Exadata environment;
- The focus of the Exadata mini would be ease of management over running complex enterprise applications.
The whole thing sounds appealing, but I must confess that the idea of “zero-DBA” Oracle takes me aback. It might look OK at demo time, but I have trouble imagining it working in live production situations.
Comments
14 Responses to “Exadata Mini-Me?”
Leave a Reply
Now, it should only take between 1 and 1.75 days to patch/update…
Hi Curt,
Are you concerned about just ORACLE in zero DBA environment or any RDBMS? As you know, it’s common to have databases embedded in mission critical systems without a DBA for it.
[…] is predicting that Oracle will release an Exadata Mini machine that will fit under ones desk (via DBMS2). And Jean-Pierre Dijcks compiled a list of Big Data related sessions at Openworld, Big Data may […]
Oracle in particular. I’d feel a lot better about, say, Progress.
Also, it’s one thing to have an application VAR drop a system into your company, that they’ve already tuned and configured, and have the whole thing just run. Even then, Oracle would probably need some remote DBA work, but I could imagine that somehow being automated away. But if you’re writing and running your own custom software, then it’s VERY hard to see that being zero-DBA.
Curt –
Interesting – this price point appears to be squarely around the same number as an entry-level SAP HANA box ($100K hardware, $120K HANA software) …
– Dennis Moore
@dbmoore
http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/39209/the-real-potential-impact-of-sap-hana/
Who wants a server under their desk, especially one that costs > $100k? Not me sir!
Exadata is aimed at the high-end market and is predicated largely on using horsepower and parallelism in the storage tier.
This approach overcomes the fact that the DBMS is general purpose and not built for BI. The Exadata architecture demands *very* large memory in the compute tier to handle the data flowing from the storage.
For the SMB market, with dramatically smaller data volumes, exactly what will a mini-Exadata deliver compared to a traditional SMP server + storage setup?
I take it as a given that ALL Oracle systems will need >0 admins 😉
The exadata architecture offloads processing and filtering to the storage tier, so less data need flow into the compute tier. This would be ideal for some BI guy to have under his desk, not having to fight DSS (or OLTP) queries on a big machine.
Why is it so odd to have a machine cost in the same magnitude as labor? Even garbage trucks cost more than the yearly labor (more than twice for the single-person automated trucks). Accountants amortize, gummint accelerates.
As far as DBA – as a single user box, any problems can just be rebooted, bill gates style. XE has been around long enough to show it can work just fine without those pesky concurrency issues.
And when full table scans are faster than everything else, you get rid of plan stability issues.
I agree with the idea of an analytic appliance or other simple analytic DBMS system for a small group of folks. That’s a big part of how Netezza got started, for example. But I’d be surprised if Oracle pulls that off this year; there’s more to it than just lowering price and footprint.
Curt the “Small Exadata” AKA Sexadata sounds interesting. Is it running Oracle RAC still? That alone is a heavy price. I’ve been expecting some sort of bundle for the MySQL segment. Do you know the target segment (OLTP/OLAP/Hybrid)?
— Mike
Mike,
Your post was held up by my spam filter for approval, probably because of your habit of keyword stuffing “Cloud Database” rather than using your real name.
Anyhow, I only “know” what I read in that article.
[…] turns out that Oracle’s new small appliance isn’t really an Exadata Mini-Me. Rather, the Oracle Database Appliance is — well, it seems to be a box with an Oracle DBMS in […]
It could have been the “s-word” that held things up in the filter. I still expect a MySQL-based appliance for the SMB space at some point. Maybe they offer a “Database.com-like” DaaS using one or the other database, but DaaS does create challenges as I’m starting to write about in my blog. I would have been surprised though if Big-O offered an Exadata-lite to cannibalize its parent at this stage in the game.
–Mike Hogan
blog: http://scaledb.blogspot.com/
OK, now it’s all over the net. It’s a 2 node RAC with a you-get-what-we-give-you configuration. This allows a 2 hour RAC installation for $50K (I take it that does not include license?). No separate compute/storage tiers, no columnar compression, so it is not a baby Exadata. Nice stuff for an smb.